考虑地形起伏和障碍体破裂的汶川地震强地面运动数值模拟

doi:10.6038/cjg2018M0228

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (6074 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要 2008年5月12日四川汶川地区发生M_W7.9地震，震中位置103.4°E，31.06°N.这次地震造成了以汶川、映秀为中心及其周边地域建筑物的严重破坏和人员的重大伤亡，且因为高山等地形复杂区域抢险救灾的艰巨性，为及时救援造成很大干扰.为更好理解地形因素对于强地面数值模拟结果的影响，建立了包含地形起伏影响及去除地形影响的两类模型.同时，依据震源破裂过程运动学反演结果，建立了包含障碍体破裂过程的震源滑动模型，实现断层分段、空间倾角以及滑移角的动态设定.基于动力学的地震动模拟方法，通过对地震波传播过程的数值计算和后处理分析，模拟由地震激发的区域强地面运动过程.结果显示：（1）强震动台站的断层距对地形效应具有放大或抑制作用，距离断层破裂带越近，地形效应越明显，反之，距离越远，则地形效应越微弱；（2）因为地形高差与障碍体的影响，地震造成的峰值可能出现在震中区域之外；（3）考虑地形影响模型的地表峰值速度（PGV）区域位于汶川与北川附近；而未考虑地形影响模型的PGV区域位于灌县—江油断层的后半段，处清平、安县附近；对汶川地震近实时强地面运动波场的模拟、峰值图谱的圈定及未来大地震强地面运动特征的预测都有重要指示意义.

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	赵由佳
	张国宏
	单新建
	尹昊
	屈春燕

关键词 ：地震动, 数值模拟, 复杂地形, 波形拟合, 汶川地震

Abstract：The M_W7.9 Wenchuan earthquake occurred in the Wenchuan area of Sichuan Province on May 12, 2008, at a location of 103.4°E and 31.06°N, and caused severe building damages and heavy casualties in Wenchuan, Yingxiu and their surrounding areas. Because of the complex mountainous terrain, timely rescue was difficult. In order to better understand the influence of topographic factors on the numerical simulation of strong ground motion, two kinds of models are established, one with complex topography effect and the other without. Additionally, according to kinematics inversion of source rupture, we incorporate earthquake source rupture model with asperity and barrier models. We also implement the spatial-temporal variations of fault segmentation, inclination and slip rake angles in the simulations. Based on the dynamic simulation of the ground motion, numerical calculation of seismic wave propagation and post-processing analysis, we simulate the ground motion induced by earthquake. The results show that: 1) the topographic effect varies with the distance between fault and strong motion station. The closer the distance is, the more obvious the topographic effect is, vice versa. 2) Due to the influence of topography, the peak of ground motion may occur outside the epicenter. 3) In model I, Peak Ground Velocity (PGV) distributions resulted from current simulation show much higher PGV values in the areas of Wenchuan, Beichuan than other places. In model Ⅱ, higher PGV area is located in the second half of the Guanxian-Jiangyou fault, near areas of Qingping, Anxian. The numerical modeling developed in this study has potential application in the ground motion prediction for the earthquake engineering. In addition, the numerical simulation could also be used to generate near-real-time shaking map in the implementation level.

Key words： Strong ground motion Numerical simulation Complex topography Waveform fitting The 2008 Wenchuan earthquake

收稿日期: 2018-03-05

PACS:

P315

基金资助:地震动力学国家重点实验室自主课题（LED2014A01），国家自然科学基金（41474013）项目共同资助.

通讯作者: 张国宏,男,1978年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事形变周期测量及其数值模拟等研究.E-mail:zhanggh@ies.ac.cn E-mail: zhanggh@ies.ac.cn

作者简介: 赵由佳,女,1993年生,硕士,主要从事震源动力学方面研究.E-mail:huaisu604@qq.com

链接本文:

http://manu39.magtech.com.cn/Geophy/CN/10.6038/cjg2018M0228 或 http://manu39.magtech.com.cn/Geophy/CN/Y2018/V61/I5/1853

Bjerrum L W, Atakan K, Sørensen M B. 2010. Reconnaissance report and preliminary ground motion simulation of the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 8(6): 1569-1601.
Deng Q D, Chen S F, Zhao X L. 1994. Tectonics, seismicity and dynamics of Longmenshan mountains and its adjacent regions. Seismology and Geology (in Chinese), 16(4): 389-402.
Douilly R, Aochi H, Calais E, et al. 2015. Three-dimensional dynamic rupture simulations across interacting faults: The M_W7.0, 2010, Haiti earthquake. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 120(2): 1108-1128.
Komatitsch D, Tromp J. 1999. Introduction to the spectral element method for three-dimensional seismic wave propagation. Geophysical Journal International, 139(3): 806-822.
Liu L N, Cui F L, Zhang J F. 2004. Seismic modeling with one-way wave equation in 3D complex structures. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 47(3): 514-520.
Meng L Y, Shi B P. 2011. Near-fault strong ground motion simulation of the May 12, 2008, M_W7.9 Wenchuan Earthquake by Dynamical composite source model. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 54(4): 1010-1027.
Teng J W, Bai D H, Yang H, et al. Deep processes and dynamic responses associated with the Wenchuan M_S8.0 earthquake of 2008. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 2008, 51(5): 1385-1402.
Wang H Y, Xie L L. 2010. Effects of topography on ground motion in the Xishan park, Zigong city. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 53(7): 1631-1638, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2010.07.014.
Wang J, Li S H, Zhou D, et al. 2013. A block-discrete-spring model to simulate failure process of rock. Rock and Soil Mechanics (in Chinese), 34(8): 2355-2362.
Wang J, Li S H, Zhang Q B. 2015. Simulation of crack propagation of rock based on splitting elements. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (in Chinese), 47(1): 105-118.
Wang L X, Li S H, Zhang G X, et al. 2013. A GPU-based parallel procedure for nonlinear analysis of complex structures using a coupled FEM/DEM approach. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013: 618980.
Wang Z L, Li Y M. 1999. Parallel algorithm for simulating Seismic wave propagation by cellular automata. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 42(3): 410-415.
Xu Z Q, Li H Q, Hou L W, et al. 2007. Uplift of the Longmen-Jinping orogenic belt along the eastern margin of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: Large-scale detachment faulting and extrusion mechanism. Geological Bulletin of China (in Chinese), 26(10): 1262-1276.
Zhang G H, Qu C Y, Shan X J, et al. 2011. Slip distribution of the 2008 Wenchuan M_S7.9 earthquake by joint inversion from GPS and InSAR measurements: A resolution test study. Geophysical Journal International, 186(1): 207-220.
Zhang G H, Vallée M, Shan X J, et al. 2012. Evidence of sudden rupture of a large asperity during the 2008 M_W7.9 Wenchuan earthquake based on strong motion analysis. Geophysical Research Letters, 39(17): L17303, doi:10.1029/2012GL052516.
Zhang H, Zhou Y Z, Wu Z L, et al. 2009. Finite element analysis of seismic wave propagation characteristics in Fuzhou basin. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 52(5): 1270-1279, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2009.05.016.
Zhang J Y, Bo J S, Wang Z Y, et al. 2012. Influence of local topography on seismic ground motion in Wenchuan earthquake. Journal of Natural Disasters (in Chinese), 21(3): 164-169.
Zhao H Y, Chen X F. 2017. Simulation of strong ground motion by the 1975 Haicheng M_S7.3 earthquake. Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 60(7): 2707-2715, doi: 10.6038/cjg20170717.
Zhu D L, Bai C Y. 2011. Review on the seismic wavefield forward modelling. Progress in Geophysics (in Chinese), 26(5): 1588-1599, doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2011.05.011.
Zhu G S. 2014. Strong ground motion simulation by finite difference method (in Chinese). Hefei: University of Science and Technology of China.
附中文参考文献
陈晓非. 2005. 强地面运动模拟与震害预测研究进展.//中国地球物理第二十一届年会论文集.中国地球物理学会年会.
邓起东, 陈社发, 赵小麟. 1994. 龙门山及其邻区的构造和地震活动及动力学. 地震地质, 16(4): 389-402.
刘礼农, 崔凤林, 张剑锋. 2004. 三维复杂构造中地震波模拟的单程波方法. 地球物理学报, 47(3): 514-520.
孟令媛, 史保平. 2011. 应用动态复合震源模型模拟汶川M_W7.9地震强地面运动. 地球物理学报, 54(4): 1010-1027.
滕吉文, 白登海, 杨辉等. 2008. 2008汶川M_S8.0地震发生的深层过程和动力学响应. 地球物理学报, 51(5): 1385-1402.
王海云, 谢礼立. 2010. 自贡市西山公园地形对地震动的影响. 地球物理学报, 53(7): 1631-1638, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2010.07.014.
王杰, 李世海, 周东等. 2013. 模拟岩石破裂过程的块体单元离散弹簧模型. 岩土力学, 34(8): 2355-2362.
王杰, 李世海, 张青波. 2015. 基于单元破裂的岩石裂纹扩展模拟方法. 力学学报, 47(1): 105-118.
王真理, 李幼铭. 1999. 细胞自动机地震波模拟的并行化算法. 地球物理学报, 42(3): 410-415.
许志琴, 李化启, 侯立炜等. 2007. 青藏高原东缘龙门—锦屏造山带的崛起——大型拆离断层和挤出机制. 地质通报, 26(10): 1262-1276.
张怀, 周元泽, 吴忠良等. 2009. 福州盆地强地面运动特征的有限元数值模拟. 地球物理学报, 52(5): 1270-1279, doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2009.05.016.
张建毅, 薄景山, 王振宇等. 2012. 汶川地震局部地形对地震动的影响. 自然灾害学报, 21(3): 164-169.
赵宏阳, 陈晓非. 2017. 1975年海城M_S7.3地震强地面运动模拟. 地球物理学报, 60(7): 2707-2715, doi: 10.6038/cjg20170717.
朱多林, 白超英. 2011. 基于波动方程理论的地震波场数值模拟方法综述. 地球物理学进展, 26(5): 1588-1599,doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2011.05.011.
朱耿尚. 2014. 有限差分方法在强地面运动模拟中的应用. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学.